Why is it the case that stuff that’s hailed as “smart” tends to be a sophisticated defense of the exisiting order?

Why is it the case that stuff that's hailed as "smart" tends to be a sophisticated defense of the exisiting order?
Why is it the case that stuff that’s hailed as “smart” tends to be a sophisticated defense of the exisiting order?

Some people benefit from the existing order, and are apt to celebrate those who defend it. Plenty of smart thinking is against the grain, though: Freud, Einstein, Jane Addams, Martin Luther King. We think of them as “the order” now, but they took a whole lot of flak for their disruptive ideas. In fact some (especially King) are misremembered as defending an order, when most of what he said & wrote criticized it.