Should Humanities exams just be 30 1 hour discussions with the professor, rather than sit down exams (at least for smaller upper-level electives)?

Should Humanities exams just be 30 1 hour discussions with the professor, rather than sit down exams (at least for smaller upper-level electives)?
Should Humanities exams just be 30 1 hour discussions with the professor, rather than sit down exams (at least for smaller upper-level electives)?

Oxford and Cambridge do something like that bit.ly/bc-tutorial. Williams offers 60-70 tutorials per year for two students each. bit.ly/bc-williams. And the Wall suspects that is why it isn’t more widespread: it’s hard to do for a student body above a certain size. If you want to dig deeper, there’s a broad literature on testing and what works in our library catalog: bit.ly/bc-tests